Receiving Report Template
Nonprofit Marketing Plan Free Template Nonprofit Marketing. Your proven path to getting attention motivating action Right Things, Right Now. Nonprofit Marketing Plan Template. Follow this clear path to the right marketing actions for your organization to take right now. Directions Complete the form below to download the Getting Attention Nonprofit Marketing Plan Template. In addition, youll start receiving Getting Attention emails. This reliable planning tool guides you to Build a marketing plan on the rock solid foundation of relevance. Connect more quickly and strongly with supporters and partners to motivate the actions you need. Highlight your priorities and not worth its whiles. Strengthen your personal confidence and skills. Shed the worry of not knowing if youre doing the right thing. Boost your orgs marketing impact via clear directions and concrete examples. Its the quickest and most reliable route to relevance and action. Relevance rulesHeres what template users have to say Your plan helps enormously. Thank you very much for this template. Weve just completed our strategic plan and are poised to plan our marketing. We didnt know where or how to start. Your plan helps enormously. Pam Voss Page, Executive Director, Student Leadership Services. This made me think of several elements I should look at more closely. You saved me. I just created a two year communications strategy, and this template highlighted several elements I should look at more closely. Thank you. Mia Taylor, Communications Specialist, LA Best Babies Network. Youve captured everything Ive been preaching for years. Many thanks for the templateyouve captured everything Ive been preaching for years plus youve confirmed that Im not off base. In addition to serving as a practical, useful tool, the plan is a victory for grant writermanagers like me. Steve Riesback, Grants and Special Projects Manager, WOUB, freelance grant writer. An excellent model. This is an excellent model. Having gone through an elaborate annual process to adapt our marketing plan to the post recession recovery environment, you made us realize that we have to be more specific to achieve our objectives. Thanks for the reality check. Ralph Penning, Trustee, Independent Business Foundation New ZealandNancy Schwartz on June 4, 2. Search Department of Children and Families Search the current Agency with a Keyword Filtered Topic Search. Click on any template for an image preview or alternatively Click on the FREE DOWNLOAD button to gain immediate access to all of the above listed templates. The SWPPP template has its own macros that were developed to. Describe proximity to receiving waters to which the project. Geotechnical Report. Raising the Federal Minimum Wage to 1. Would Lift Wages for Millions and Provide a Modest Economic Boost. Earlier this year, EPI released an analysis of the Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2. Sen. Tom Harkin D Iowa and Rep. Receiving Report Template' title='Receiving Report Template' />George Miller D Calif. Cooper and Hall 2. The Harkin Miller proposal would then index the minimum wage to inflation, so that as prices rise in subsequent years, the minimum would automatically be adjusted to preserve its real value. At the same time, the bill would raise the base wage paid to tipped workers from the current 2. It is important to acknowledge the receipt of some goods or products from a company to ensure no future disputes over the delivery. It is a good safeguard measure. Report Wages, Incomes, and Wealth. Raising the Federal Minimum Wage to 10. Would Lift Wages for Millions and Provide a Modest Economic Boost. About eSRS. This is the official site for the electronic Subcontracting Reporting System eSRS. The use of eSRS promises to create higher visibility for federal. Need a simple way for your customers to report an incident, bug, or complaint Try JotForm, and get started with a customizable online report form template. Official Audit Report April 17, 2013. Office of Medicaid MassHealth Medicaid Claims for Drug Screenings. For the period July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2011. Receiving Report Template' title='Receiving Report Template' />Since that analysis was released, five states have raised their state minimum wages California, Connecticut, New Jersey, New York, and Rhode Island. The increases in these states underscore the broad recognition that the current federal minimum wage is too low. These increases slightly alter our earlier estimates of the impact of a federal minimum wage increase to 1. Yet the conclusion of our previous analysis remains unchanged Raising the federal minimum wage to 1. American workers and provide a modest boost to U. S. GDP. This paper provides an update to our original analysis that reflects these higher state minimum wages, and changes in economic conditions over the past year. It begins by providing some context for the current minimum wage and the Harkin Miller proposal, describing how todays minimum and the proposed new minimum compare with historical benchmarks. It then provides a demographic overview of the workers who would be affected both directly and indirectly by raising the federal minimum wage to 1. Finally, it details the GDP and job creation effects that would occur as a result of such an increase. Key findings include Raising the federal minimum wage to 1. An increase to 1. Across the phase in period of the increase, GDP would grow by about 2. The workers who would receive a raise do not fit the stereotypes of low wage workers. Among affected workers, the average age is 3. Of affected workers, about 5. Almost Newlywed Game Questions Bridal Shower on this page. The average affected worker earns half of his or her familys total income. The minimum wage in context. Every year that the minimum wage remains the same in nominal dollars, inflation slowly erodes its real i. This, of course, threatens the material well being of minimum wage workers in low income families who rely on every dollar of income just to afford basic necessities. At the current federal minimum wage of 7. This was not always the case. As shown in Figure A, throughout the 1. At its high point in real value in the late 1. Figure AAnnual minimum wage earnings and poverty line for families of two to four, 1. Note Poverty thresholds for 2. U. S. Census Bureau thresholds by CBO projected inflation for 2. The poverty threshold for one adult, two children is slightly higher 1. Projections are based upon CBO inflation projections and the proposal to raise the minimum wage to 1. Annual earnings are calculated assuming workers work 4. Source Authors analysis of Harkin Miller proposal, U. S. Census Bureau 2. CBO 2. 01. 3, and U. S. Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division 2. The black dotted line in the figure shows what a full time minimum wage worker would earn if the minimum wage were raised to 1. Harkin Miller bill proposes. Such an increase would return a full time minimum wage income to a level sufficient to protect a family of three from poverty. Because the Harkin Miller bill would also index the minimum wage to inflation, full time minimum wage workers would never again fall below this threshold. The declining real value of the minimum wage has also significantly contributed to the enormous growth in U. S. income inequality Mishel 2. The gap between the minimum wage and the average wage of typical American workers used to be much smaller than it is today. Figure B depicts the value of the minimum wage as a percentage of the average wage of production, non supervisory workers. From the mid 1. 96. American worker. Todays minimum wage is equal to only 3. Raising the minimum wage to 1. Figure BFederal minimum wage as a percentage of the average U. S. wage of productionnonsupervisory workers, 1. July 2. 01. 6Source Authors analysis of Harkin Miller proposal, Current Population Survey Outgoing Rotation Group microdata, and U. S. Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division 2. It is important to also recognize that todays minimum wage has not fallen to exceptional lows out of economic necessity. Revo Uninstaller Pro Activation File more. Over the past 4. 5 years, the U. S. economy has vastly expanded, and productivity our ability to produce goods and services for the same amount of work has more than doubled. Yet the minimum wageour agreed upon standard for the minimum amount a worker in our society should be paidhas been left to stagnate and decline. Figure C shows the value of the minimum wage since 1. Figure CReal value of the federal minimum wage, 1. Productivity and average wage projections from 2. Harkin Miller proposal. Note Dollars are deflated using CPI U RS and CBO inflation projections. Projected wage values are based on CBO inflation projections, average wage and productivity growth from 2. Source Authors analysis of Total Economy Productivity data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics BLS Labor Productivity and Costs program, BLS Current Employment Statistics, Current Population Survey Outgoing Rotation Group microdata, CBO 2. U. S. Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division 2. Harkin Miller proposal. As the figure shows, the minimum wage in 1. Black Magic Disk Speed Test Dmg S. Had it grown from that point at the same rate as growth in wages for the typical American worker, it would be about 1. If the minimum wage had grown at the same rate as productivity, it would be 1. As depicted by the dotted black line, the Harkin Miller proposal to raise the minimum wage to 1. Demographic characteristics of affected workers. Increasing the minimum wage to 1. American workers, most of whom do not fit the prevailing impressions of low wage workers as teenagers working part time jobs for extra spending money. Figure D shows the number of workers who would be directly and indirectly affected in each year of the proposed incremental increases. Figure DNumber of workers in millions affected by raising the federal minimum wage to 1. July 2. 01. 6Year. Directly affected. Indirectly affected. Source Authors analysis of Harkin Miller proposal using Current Population Survey Outgoing Rotation Group microdata. With the initial increase to 8. These are workers who currently earn between 7. Another 2. 7 million workers with wages just above 8. Shierholz 2. 00. 9. In the second year, as the federal minimum wage is increased to 9. In the final increase to 1. American workers would see their pay increase, with 1. We now examine the demographic characteristicsin terms of gender, age, work hours, family income, and family compositionof the workers who would be directly and indirectly affected. Gender. While raising the minimum wage would benefit both men and women, it would disproportionately affect women. As depicted in Figure E, women account for 4. U. S. employment, yet comprise 5. The share of those affected who are women varies somewhat by state, from a low of 4. California to a high of 6. Mississippi. Figure EGender distribution of workers affected by raising the federal minimum wage to 1. July 2. 01. 6, and of total employment. Female. Male. Share of total employment. Share of affected workers.